Connect with us


“The whole process was shocking”

Families affected by motor neurone disease are fighting a losing battle for accessible housing and home alterations, as Ethan Sisterson reports.



The progression of motor neurone disease can be cruelly fast.

The last thing families affected by it need, then, are delays in getting the vital support they are entitled to.

But in households across the UK, red tape and the stuttering mechanics of local councils are causing needless hold ups in essential home alterations. Ultimately, people with the disease are becoming trapped in unsuitable housing conditions, a new study has found.

A core problem highlighted in the report is the patchy nature of how Disabled Facilities Grants (DFGs) are delivered to people with MND.

DGFs enable various accessibility measures such as ramps, wider doorways, wet rooms – or any other change that makes home life possible as the disease’s influence on mobility grows.

It is means tested and available in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The findings suggest that many people with MND are struggling to access them at all, or at least within a reasonable time frame.

The end result is a litany of horror stories in which patients and loved ones are being let down by a system supposedly designed to help them.

One personal account in the Motor Neurone Disease (MND) Association’s report details how workers turned up to adapt doorways for a wheelchair on the day that the individual died – such had been the delays to the process.

Another respondent in the charity’s Act to Adapt report says: “We applied for financial aid but were turned down for any assistance as we both worked.

“We were told to reapply when our circumstances changed. As far as we were concerned they had already changed dramatically and we didn’t have time to wait! Joe’s work colleagues, family and friends began raising money to have our house adapted.

“As it turned out, it really was too late for Joe. Seven months after diagnosis Joe died. The whole process was shocking to me. I couldn’t believe that we were basically told we would have to do it ourselves.”

Among similarly bleak anecdotes, one family member notes: “The ramp and wheelchair came too late and because of length of time for grant for wet room we had to make do with a poor version that flooded every time we used it.”

Another says: “MND is a disease where you are always chasing your tail. One day you are ok … the next you have lost a personal faculty. Property adaptations for people [with] MND should be impressively proactive – more in expectation than reaction.”

Around 4,500 people in the UK have MND. Statistically, a third will die within 12 months of diagnosis and more than half within two years.

A speedy DFG outcome is clearly required against such time frames but, as Alex Massey, policy manager for the MND Association explains, it is not always achieved.

“The main issue our report brings out is the length of time it takes to access support for people who need to adapt their home. In many cases, the timelines are simply far too long.

“MND is a very rapidly progressing condition. When you have a situation where the application for a grant takes six months to process, that’s totally inappropriate.”

Costs keeping families trapped  

The charity surveyed 850 people, including those living with MND, carers, health and social care professionals and the charity’s own volunteers.

Of the 387 respondents affected by MND as a patient, carer or loved one, 96 per cent cited the cost of adaptations as a major barrier to adapting their home.

A further 39 per cent blamed a lack of financial help for adaptations or house moves.

A fifth said the length of time it took to hear whether they were eligible for grants such as the DFG was a problem and 23 per cent pointed to a lack of support from local services.

Professionals were also asked what they felt were the biggest barriers people living with and affected by MND faced when securing accessible housing.

Of 92 respondents, 87 per cent highlighted the emotional burden of having to organise adaptations or move home.

The MND Association says its staff strongly agree with this, and it was a theme at its recent “engagement events”.

Eighty three per cent indicated that a lack of available accessible homes was a barrier, and three quarters chose the length of time waiting for an accessible home.

A creaking system 

Massey also points to the use of an outdated means test which potentially leads to individuals being unfairly rejected for DFGs.

To qualify for a DFG, a person must demonstrate that the work is ‘necessary and appropriate’ to meet their needs, including moving around and getting in and out of their property, and that the work is ‘reasonable and practicable’.

There is also a ‘test of resources’, which is based on household income and savings.

Certain benefits, such as Employment and Support Allowance and Universal Credit, mean that a person will be passported through the means test.

Massey says: “The means tests look at income and assets, but what it doesn’t look at is the real cost of living and coping with a highly disabling progressive condition like MND.

“The cost of care and support, additional costs for things like energy and transport all add up, so people find they are hit with significant financial costs which can be difficult to manage.”

This was echoed in the report, with a consensus of people stating that the means test for DFGs is unfair, particularly in terms of both the low savings limit and the fact that it does not consider real outgoings, which can be substantial for someone with MND.

MND Costs – a separate MND Association study and campaign – found that the extra regular and enhanced costs of managing the disease equates to £9,645 per year, not including one-off costs for equipment and adaptations.

“A lack of flexibility, or realistic consideration of the loss of income working aged people with MND will often face, can also result in both delays and financial hardship” says MND Association in its latest report.

“Problems are also caused by the fact that the test of resources is based on household, rather than individual, income,” it continues.

Darren Buckey, motor neurone disease patientDarren’s story 

Darren Buckley (pictured) is among those with MND that was turned down for a DFG, having been diagnosed in August 2018.

“When I applied for the DFG, a woman from the council came to see me at my home.

“The first thing she said which made me feel optimistic was that ‘we’ve got half a million pounds of funds available this tax year for adaptations’.

“I then went through all the questions she said it would take a couple of days to be fed into the computer and it would be a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’. I thought that sounded reasonable.

“Unfortunately I didn’t get the outcome until a week to 10 days later when I got a phone call – no written information – from the same officer.

“She said that the computer had basically said I was able to contribute £140,000 towards adaptations in the house so I was not entitled to a penny for major adaptations work.”

Darren immediately requested written confirmation of his DFG rejection to support his case for charitable funds.

“It took three weeks for them to reply with a written note to say my DFG was not successful. So that wasn’t a good start.”

Darren contacted local builders and architects and used his medical retirement pension fund to adapt his home – with some additional charitable support.

“I was lucky to have that, I know some people don’t. But then after I had been told I couldn’t have anything from the DFG, I was then informed I could have minor works done worth up to £1000 – for things like a stair rail or shower seat.

“I was hoping to get my wet room up to standard and asked whether they could fund a specialist toilet or a ceiling hoist for my future development.

“The OT was then told by their manager that there was no further funding from council. I heard nothing from my OT after that until recently when my bedroom was being completed I was asking about a hospital profile bed.

“I went back to the OT team and they told me my case was closed because I was no longer a priority.”

In the end, his GP stepped in and helped him to the secure the bed he needed without the council’s input.

“The only support I got from the council was before I applied for DFG when they put in a stair rail and shower-board when I was still able to walk. From an OT point of view with my local council, the word I would use is shocking.”

Overall, Darren found the DFG process frustrating at a time when he was adjusting to the realities of living with a terminal condition.

“The council came out for the DFG and said ‘oh great you’ve got a garage, it’ll be good for the future, you’ll be able to have ground floor living’. Then said, ‘no you can’t have anything’. That was a smack in the teeth but I thought I had to go through them because I pay my council tax and should go through them for my social needs.

“The community nurse said to me last week, ‘you shouldn’t be paying for all this’ but I’ve got no choice when I keep getting told that there’s no funding.”

Rising costs 

The MND Association’s report shows that the average value of a DFG rose from just over £7,000 in 2009/10 to nearly £9,000 in 2016/17, reflecting increases in building costs.

There is considerable regional variation, however; in London, only a third cost less than £5,000, whereas in most other areas between a half and two thirds are under £5,000.

The average cost of the two most common adaptations is £5,000, for showers, and between £2,400 and £4,500 for stairlifts.

The impact of such changes can be priceless, however.

“I have had a week of using the facilities,” says Darren of his adaptations.

“It’s like a new lease of life. It has really made me feel like myself, I can do these things again.

“I’m able to live and dress independently. This morning it probably took me about 55 minutes to an hour to get ready, but I have done it myself, so I still feel good about it.”

On the importance of accessible housing, the report says: “Being trapped in inaccessible housing is linked to a range of negative impacts on physical and mental health, resulting from factors such as isolation and loneliness, lack of physical activity, disengagement from family and community, and unsafe environments contributing to accidents such as falls.

“For disabled people and people with health conditions, homes need to be built around their needs.”

The DFG scheme is 30 years old this year and has, of course, helped many people to tailor their homes to their needs.

But MND Association’s data suggests accessing it is something of a post code lottery. Responding to freedom of information requests, 26 English councils said they spent less than 50 per cent of their DFG budget in 2016/17, while 80 spent 100 per cent or even more.

The funding allocation process for councils is not transparent, says the report, so ascertaining reasons for these discrepancies has proven challenging.


The Act to Adapt report is now calling for a number of changes at local and national government levels in how the scheme is delivered – and more broadly – to improve swift access to suitable housing for people with MND.

Massey says: “We really want to encourage local authorities to build on some of the best practice that exists out there so that we start to see good practice spread more widely across the country.

“We would also like to see them all keeping an accessible housing register; because it’s not just about existing homes, but also about supporting people to find alternative accommodation.

“Also, it can be very difficult to simply know what options are out there in terms of which properties are accessible, which is not something you can usually find out from your local estate agent.

“Accessible housing is a fundamental right that needs to be respected and delivered.

“I think it’s pretty well accepted now that there are strong links between appropriate accessible housing and health and wellbeing outcomes.”

The recommendations in the report include the introduction of a fast-track process for adaptations under £5,000 to be implemented by all authorities responsible for DFGs.

The report also urges discretionary support in certain circumstances, for example for people with a terminal illness.

Sharing of good practice in terms of providing advice, support and information is also encouraged.

Read the Motor Neurone Disease Association’s report in full here.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Update:concussion in sport

A run through the latest developments in concussion in sport research and protocols.



A study published in the May 27 in the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology, looked at a biomarker called neurofilament light chain, a nerve protein that can be detected in the blood when nerve cells are injured or die.

Levels of the protein in the blood were measured and it was found that those with three or more concussions had an average blood levels of neurofilament light 33 per cent higher than those who had never had a concussion.

“The main finding in the study is that people with multiple concussions have more of these proteins in their blood, even years after the last injury,” said study author Kimbra L. Kenney, M.D of the National Intrepid Center of Excellence.

“Additionally, these proteins may help predict who will experience more severe symptoms such as PTSD and depression. That’s exciting because we may be able to intervene earlier to help lessen the overall effects of concussions over time.”

Following on from our article on the game changing tests into concussion in children it has been found that concussions sustained by high school athletes continues to increase.

Injury data collected from 100 high schools for sports including football, volleyball and wrestling found that, between the academic years 2015 and 2017, the average amount of concussions annually increased 1.012-fold compared to the previous four academic years.

Approximately 300,000 teens suffer concussions or mild traumatic brain injuries each year while playing high school sports.

Wellington Hsu, M.D, professor of orthopedics at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine said: “It’s understandable to think that with increased awareness among practitioners who diagnose concussions, the incidence would naturally rise; however because we’ve studied and reported on concussions for a number of years now, I feel that enough time has passed and I would have expected to see the numbers start to level out.

“What we found was that the overall average proportion of concussions reported annually in all sports increased significantly, as did the overall rate of concussions.”

The data also revealed that in gender-matched sports, girls seemingly sustain concussions at a higher rate than boys.

The effects of concussion in young people continues to be a key concern, with links between concussion and football, specifically when heading the ball leading to some big changes when it comes to training guidelines.

Coaches have been advised to update their rules connected to heading the ball in training, with no heading at all in the foundation phase for primary school children and a “graduated approach” to introduce heading training at under-12 to under-16 level. This guidance is expected to be issued across the continent later this year.

These new guidelines were recommended following a FIELD study, joint-funded by the English FA and the Professional Footballers’ Association, published in October last year, finding that professional footballers were three-and-a-half times more likely to die of a neurodegenerative disease than members of the general population of the same age.

The study did not identify a cause for this increased risk, but repeated heading of a ball and other head injuries have been identified as possible factors.

Dr Carol Routledge, director of research at Alzheimer’s Research UK, said: “Limiting unnecessary heading in children’s football is a practical step that minimises possible risks, ensuring that football remains as safe as possible in all forms.

“As such, measures to reduce exposure to unnecessary head impacts and risk of head injury in sport are a logical step. I would, however, like to see these proposals introduced as mandatory, rather than voluntary as present, and a similar approach to reduce heading burden adopted in the wider game of football, not just in youth football.”

A similar stance, that also includes restrictions during matches, has been in place in the US since 2015 after a number of coaches and parents took legal action against the US Soccer Federation.

There is clearly a need to educate coaches and athletes about the concussion recovery process while equipping physicians with quick diagnostic tools.

A partnership between Neurotechnology and brain health analytics player SyncThink and concussion education technology specialist TeachAids aims to offer the latest concussion education combined with mobile, objective measurement technology.

EYE-SYNC, which allows a clinician to use analysis to decipher between brain systems to determine whether a patient may be performing poorly or impaired, will create a brain health education and evaluation system based on the implementation of CrashCourse, an interactive educational module that teaches athletes, parents and coaches about concussions.

This implementation will be available to all SyncThink partners which include top athletic organisations and clinical partners providing medical care and education for over 10,000 high school and college athletes.

This implementation could make tracking those who receive concussion education easier while complying with sport governing bodies educational requirements.

SyncThink founder and medical advisor to TeachAids, Jamshid Ghajar said: “Using the SyncThink platform to feature the CrashCourse educational technology for athletes and coaches is brilliant.

“Now clinicians can use the Eye-Sync tests and metrics alongside CrashCourse’s latest evidence-based information on concussion.”

Continue Reading


Stepping up the fight against alcohol-related brain injury



Alcohol-related brain injury (ARBI) is becoming more widely recognised, but specific rehab services for the condition are surprisingly rare.

With few dedicated units for patients with ARBI, many patients in need of specialist care instead find themselves in a hospital or even an elderly care home.

ARBI is characterised by prolonged cognitive impairment and changes in the brain due to chronic alcohol consumption.

The average age of diagnosis in men is 55, and only 45 for women – following at least five years of excessive alcohol consumption, of around 50 units per week in men and 35 for women.

ARBI is not a degenerative condition, with up to 75 per cent of patients recovering to some degree with the correct support; and the first three months following diagnosis are recognised as key in a person’s recovery. Access to appropriate provision, therefore, is even more crucial at this time.

In February, UK-wide charity Leonard Cheshire opened a residential unit in Northern Ireland to help some of the many patients in need in the country. It is the first facility of its kind on the island of Ireland. 

The 14-bed unit, near Belfast, opened inconveniently – after years of planning – just as the COVID-19 crisis was emerging.

Its work goes on, however, with the centre taking patients from across the country, though initially from the capital and surrounding areas.

The residential centre aims to support residents over a two to three-year period, although that can be shorter for some patients. It helps them to live independently, by building the life skills and confidence to do so. 

Naomi Brown, clinical lead at the centre, joined Leonard Cheshire late last year to oversee the opening of the facility, following an extensive career in brain injury work and in being part of multidisciplinary teams.  

She says: “The background here in Northern Ireland is that the acquired brain injury (ABI) service is really well structured and established but for ARBI, often the person wouldn’t meet the criteria for addiction services, but their needs would not be such that they needed to be admitted to hospital, or even fulfil the criteria for ABI services, so they would fall through the cracks.

“The provision they receive would often come from the care sector, but to end up in a care home at what could be a very young age is not appropriate either.

“There is a real lack of options. Their care managers recognise they aren’t in the appropriate setting for them, but through a lack of alternatives, it is very difficult.

“A lot of symptoms are very similar to those under the influence of alcohol, difficulty with balance and memory for example, which can make ARBI difficult to diagnose.

“Often it can be something like liver failure that gets them into hospital, but then it becomes obvious there are cognitive issues there too.

“Our centre only has 14 beds, which we don’t pretend is going to answer the scale of the problem, but the decision to restrict it to that number is that we don’t want quantity over quality. To try and accommodate huge numbers would risk the patient-centred approach that we are really proud of, so we wanted to keep it on a small scale.

“But there are 14 places here at any one time for people to get access to the specialist rehabilitation they need, so we are really pleased to be able to offer this.”

With the centre’s goal being the independent living of its patients, a resident-led rehab plan is created for each individual, based around their individual goals and aspirations.

It is delivered by Leonard Cheshire’s team of rehab assistants, supported by clinicians, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists and neuropsychologists who come in to hold sessions with the residents, and overseen by Naomi. 

“From the minute someone is admitted to us, we are already planning for their discharge, even though that may be a long time and a lot of work away.

“From the very start, it’s about the individual, it’s absolutely not a generic approach, even though the ultimate outcome for everyone may be the same. Most people who move in do want to live independently, so if that’s their goal and we will do all we can to help them achieve that, with a plan individualised for them. 

“Some people will come to us and we realise they won’t be here very long as they do very well very quickly, but for others, they are going to be with us for two or three years.

“Some people arrive and love it here and say they don’t want to leave, which is a great reflection on the work we do and the centre we’ve created, but the ambition is that the point will come where they realise they don’t need us anymore.

“Through the work we do and our interventions, we can make very good progress. We’ve had some people here already who have been in quite an acute state but the progress they make brings joy into my heart.”

One such patient is David* who, despite only being with the centre for a matter of weeks, has made significant progress in his recovery.

Prior to moving to Leonard Cheshire, he lived in a nursing home for two years.

Before his arrival, Naomi remembers he had low mood, minimal spontaneous conversation and spent long periods of time in his bed sleeping.

He had no clear weekly routine and lacked any scheduled therapeutic or recreational activities.

Naomi says: “David initially required a significant amount of support to initiate activities, engage with others or even leave his room. He has slowly adjusted to the active therapeutic programme in the unit and his mood has improved significantly.

“His mobility and exercise tolerance has greatly increased, he participates in group activities, is now more spontaneous in conversation and has developed facial expressions. David has been able to self-identify rehabilitation goals and discovered a new love for playing the drums and guitar. 

“He is in the very early stages of his rehabilitation but having spent three months in the ARBI unit, the change is his quality of life is already dramatic.

“He engages in an individual, weekly timetable which includes activities of daily living, physical, cognitive and social activities, and is reportedly very happy in his current placement. Once the COVID-19 restrictions are lifted, we very much hope to begin reintegrating David to the local community and making future plans for his discharge.”

David’s experience is one which the unit is keen to replicate, by engaging patients from the earliest stages of their arrival at Leonard Cheshire in building a new and healthier daily routine.

“We are always keen to introduce routine, as that is so important in the longer-term. Where some people have maybe traditionally watched TV all night then get up into the afternoon, we try to create a new routine with lots of support services available in the morning. A healthy routine is what we want them to have when they go back home,” says Naomi.  

“We encourage people to do things for themselves – to get up, make yourself breakfast, maybe do some gardening or help with the cleaning, all things which promote the ability to do things independently.

“If they put the washer on, they’ll need to go back to it when it’s finished. We have rehab assistants on-hand to support them, but we do actively encourage independence.”

Everyone has an individual timetable for the week based on their own interests, combined with their clinical requirements, which centres on promoting reintegration into the community.

“It’s very individualised, so if someone wants to do an online course or learn how to cook for themselves, or learn a musical instrument, we’ll focus on that. We have a fantastic team here who will turn their hand to anything for the benefit of our residents,” says Naomi.

“As well as activities in the centre, we do a lot in the community, or rather we did before COVID-19, but that will resume when it’s safe to do so. We did sports activities, yoga classes, bowling, it’s not just your classic physio. We want people to be engaged and comfortable with the world outside. 

“We will always ensure residents have support once they leave us, and are setting that up long before they go.

“If there was someone who was with us who wasn’t from Belfast, we would use resources we knew were transferable to where they lived, so they didn’t leave us and not know how to access support.

“We build up these links with community services in the relevant discharge areas, so ideally the person will already be confident at being independent and will have the added assurance of knowing they continue to be supported.”

The Leonard Cheshire centre’s launch came amid changes to Northern Ireland’s legislative backdrop with the implementation of the Mental Capacity Act (NI) 2016. This has new deprivation of liberty regulations, a significant new introduction for the country and its approach to capacity and consent.

Naomi says: “When planning for the opening of a new centre, a global pandemic wasn’t on the radar, and for it also to coincide with the new mental capacity legislation meant it was a really busy time for us in the early stages, the COVID-19 aspect of which we could not have foreseen. 

“The pandemic did present challenges for our residents, many have a certain level of confusion so it’s difficult for them to always remember that they can’t be close to someone else, they have to regularly wash their hands. There is a lot of prompting which leads to a certain amount of frustration. While they are watching these things on TV about how COVID is affecting the world, it’s hard to relate that to everyday life.”

New referrals continue to arrive during the pandemic, from both hospital discharge and moving from a care home environment, although happily the Leonard Cheshire unit has remained COVID-19 free.

“We were keen to admit new residents and take referrals from hospitals and care homes, subject to extra measures being in place to protect ourselves and our residents.

“We wanted to continue to support hospitals and free up beds, but also to offer the appropriate care to people whose specific needs through their ARBI diagnosis meant they would be better in our centre than a hospital environment or care home.

“This has certainly been a challenging period in which to start our ARBI unit, but we have come through it well together so far and we look forward to continuing to develop ourselves as we come out of the pandemic and go into the future.”

*Name changed for anonymity.

Continue Reading


Neurobehavioural rehab in aggression management after TBI

Changes in personality following TBIs are often more problematic than neurocognitive, functional deficits or even physical disabilities. Dr Grzegorz Grzegorzak, consultant neuropsychiatrist at St Peter’s Hospital, South Wales, explains why taking a neurobehavioural approach to treating TBI can be highly effective.



Personality changes are sometimes referred to as neurobehavioural disability (ND), especially when associated with social difficulties.

The concept of ND involves impairments of numerous aspects of functioning including the abilities to self- monitor and self-regulate, to control frustration, anger and aggression, to tolerate delay in gratification, and to self-motivate.

These impairments can lead to a sense of being overwhelmed when facing situations requiring control and management of internal impulses or coping with social situations or tasks.

Impulsivity, disinhibition and aggression all have significant potential to interfere with rehabilitation efforts, jeopardize recovery and become a major obstacle to successful functioning in social roles.

Research estimates the prevalence of aggression in survivors of TBI as being as high as 33.7 per cent.

Addressing aggression as soon as it arises is critical to the individual’s recovery.

Sometimes aggressive behaviour is so intense and frequent that its management takes priority over all other aspects of care and rehabilitation.

Neurobehavioural rehabilitation (NR) was introduced in the late 1970‘s as an attempt to improve functional abilities of TBI patients.

NR stems from recognising that people who survive TBI can still learn new skills to self-regulate and to modify their behaviour.

The basis of NR is embedded in learning theory and thus the success of NR is reliant on the patient’s ability to make use of new information and experiences.

Therefore, NR is only suitable for the post-acute phase of recovery from TBI, and in fact is intended as a medium to long term rehabilitation programme.

​NR interventions are composed of comprehensive and multidisciplinary efforts to create a user-friendly, supportive and encouraging social environment which facilitates therapeutic interactions and activities.

Specific goals and detailed routines are constructed for each patient individually, based on structured collection of data informed by behavioural analysis.

The process of designing and implementing the interventions puts emphasis on personal autonomy.

Clinical formulation is preferred over medical diagnosis. The attitude of the MDT should always be positive, embracing a strong belief in the patient’s ability to achieve their goals, improve and recover.

Carefully managed feedback and positive reinforcement are an essential part of NR.

Consistent interactions with every member of the team are of utmost importance, given that neurobehavioural intervention should not be limited to scheduled activities but in fact incorporated in every interaction.

Over the last forty years the model has been implemented by many neurorehabilitation services worldwide.

Several case studies describing recovery pathways through NR paint a very positive picture, and our own experience at St Peter’s of adopting a neurobehavioural approach has demonstrated it can produce real and measurable outcomes for both our patients andtheir families.

Case Study: Mehmet

On admission to St Peter’s Hospital, Mehmet presented with extreme challenging behaviours including serious assaults on staff, destruction of environment, verbal abuse and shouting.

Mehmet has frontal lobe dysfunction as a result of a head injury he sustained. For the previous 18 months he had been in a general hospital.

At St Peter’s a bespoke positive behaviour support plan and activity plan were developed with Mehmet’s input and reflecting his cultural needs which, under the supervision of his MDT, promoted positive changes to his social interactions, routines and activities.

Over nine months Mehmet’s challenging behaviours reduced significantly and he now enjoys a wide range of activities including regular community visits and has strengthened his relationship with his family.

Dr Grzegorz Grzegorzak is one of the consultant neuropsychiatrists at St Peter’s Hospital a specialist 39-bed Neuropsychiatric facility in Newport, South Wales run by the Ludlow Street Healthcare Group.

Continue Reading